Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOBA Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BOBA Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be WP:SPIP. Wikipedia:Notability_(cryptocurrencies) would suggest this is not a notable project. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Some WP:ROUTINE coverage, but nothing substantial enough to meet GNG. SpinningSpark 11:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looking through Boba Network's coverage in WP refs yields an article in Reuters (republished in Yahoo Finance) about how a bunch of random investors invested in this project, five press releases, a podcast episode, and a FORBESCON article. (Google News hits are no better, being almost entirely cryptocurrency-centric publications.) This topic fails WP:GNG/WP:NCRYPTO. Duckmather (talk) 18:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.